Using all teams from 2010-14, the relationship between OPS differential and winning pct is
Pct = .5 + 1.3246*OPSDIFF
The Cubs currently have an OPS differential of .175. So they should have a winning pct of about .732 instead of "only" .662. They should have 56 wins, not just 51. Baseball Reference (where I got all my data) shows a Pythagorean total for the Cubs of 56.
Bad timing might be the reason the Cubs have not reached 56 wins.
The table shows some of their hitting splits.
Split | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
RISP | 0.260 | 0.370 | 0.447 | 0.818 |
None on | 0.249 | 0.337 | 0.431 | 0.768 |
Men On | 0.262 | 0.362 | 0.436 | 0.797 |
Late & Close | 0.205 | 0.329 | 0.324 | 0.653 |
High Lvrge | 0.264 | 0.362 | 0.406 | 0.769 |
Medium Lvrge | 0.245 | 0.338 | 0.427 | 0.766 |
Low Lvrge | 0.258 | 0.351 | 0.448 | 0.799 |
The table shows some of their pitching splits.
Split | BA | OBP | SLG | OPS |
RISP | 0.208 | 0.297 | 0.346 | 0.643 |
None on | 0.210 | 0.276 | 0.333 | 0.609 |
Men On | 0.202 | 0.286 | 0.317 | 0.603 |
Late & Close | 0.198 | 0.286 | 0.303 | 0.589 |
High Lvrge | 0.207 | 0.288 | 0.292 | 0.580 |
Medium Lvrge | 0.196 | 0.266 | 0.319 | 0.584 |
Low Lvrge | 0.216 | 0.290 | 0.346 | 0.636 |
The hitters do well with runners on and w/RISP but overall they do better in Low Leverage situations and, of course, late & close is a weakness (which is just a random thing). The only problem for the pitchers seems to be a somewhat high OPS w/RISP but they do much better in Medium and High Leverage Cases.
No comments:
Post a Comment