This is another one of those "Tenace was better than is commonly thought" articles. Here is the link to his Retrosheet page Gene Tenace. I was looking at the best hitting seasons by catchers to see where Joe Mauer this year ranks and I noticed that Tenace did fairly well. Using the Lee Sinins Complete Baseball Encyclopedia, here are the top 10 seasons since 1900 by catchers who qualified for the batting title in offensive winning percentage(OWP):
1    Mike Piazza              1997     .814   
2    Mike Piazza              1995     .783   
3    Mickey Cochrane          1933     .769   
4    Mike Piazza              1996     .757   
5    Roger Bresnahan          1906     .745   
6    Darren Daulton           1992     .745   
7    Chris Hoiles             1993     .741   
8    Roy Campanella           1951     .739   
9    Mickey Cochrane          1931     .732   
10   Gene Tenace              1975     .732   
(this means seasons where their most common position was that of catcher). Tenace had only 3 seasons as a catcher when he also qualified for the batting title. All 3 are in the top 60 seasons since 1900 for catchers. One is 44th (.680). The other is 56th (.668). The only 8 years he had 400+ PAs were from 1973-80. Here are the top 25 in OWP during that time period with 2500+ PAs:
1    Joe Morgan                 .737   
2    Rod Carew                  .727   
3    Reggie Jackson             .724   
4    Willie Stargell            .717   
5    Ken Singleton              .703   
6    Reggie Smith               .696   
7    Oscar Gamble               .688   
8    George Brett               .684   
9    Fred Lynn                  .684   
10   Mike Schmidt               .682   
11   Gene Tenace                .677   
12   George Foster              .676   
13   Dave Parker                .667   
14   Bob Watson                 .658   
15   Mike Hargrove              .647   
16   Cesar Cedeno               .647   
17   Ken Griffey Sr.            .646   
18   Jim Rice                   .645   
19   Eddie Murray               .645   
20   Dave Winfield              .643   
21   Keith Hernandez            .643   
22   Greg Luzinski              .642   
23   Andre Thornton             .635   
24   Pete Rose                  .635   
25   Jose Cruz                  .633   
He does well (actually 16 of these guys had at least 4000 PAs and no one was under 2700). Of course, it his Tenace's prime years, so it is slightly biased in his favor. But he still looks good. Of the 10 guys ahead of him, 6 are in the Hall of Fame. And I see that he is ahead of 3 Hall of Famers shown here (and a few more ranked lower), who were generally going through the quality part of their careers. If not, they were certainly not in any kind of decline phase. 
In those years, here is where he ranked in OWP:
1973 4th (.714)
1974 22nd (.597)
1975 6th (.732)
1976 4th (.693)
1977 9th (.680)
1978 11th (.665)
1979 10th (.668)
He did not qualify for the league lead in 1980 with just 416 PAs. But his OWP was .650 that year. 1974 was the only year in this period he was under .650.
I also came up with a point system several years ago (probably 5-7 years ago). I only counted seasons when a player had a .600+ OWP. I then multiplied his PAs that season times (OWP - .600). The idea was to calculate how much high quality hitting players did. Tenace ranked 131st among all hitters. He ranked 8th among catchers. But through 2008, he ranked only 161st in games at catcher with 914 (for some reason his own personal file at Sinins shows only 892 games at catcher). So his high rank is remarkable given he did not play that much at the position. He got exactly 1 vote for the Hall of Fame in 1989 and was, of course, dropped from futher balloting getting less than 5% (0.2%, actually). Anyway, here is the link: Ranking Hitters by Their Performance Above a .600 Offensive Winning Percentage. Here is the top 10 in that:
Mike Piazza  601.21
Bill Dickey  412.07
Mick. Cochrane  326.31
Yogi Berra  321.63
Carlton Fisk  301.47
Buck Ewing  268.16
Fred Carroll  266.11
Gene Tenace  265.57
Johnny Bench  259.78
Rog. Bresnahan  255.04
Bill James says that 20 Win Shares in a season constitutes an all-star type year. Tenace had at least 22 every year from 1973-79. In 1975, he had 32, tied for 4th place, 1 behind MVP Fred Lynn and John Mayberry and Ken Singleton. He averaged 24.7 WS per season over those 7 years. His 198 WS for the 1970s was the 31st highest total, including pitchers. He ranks 177th in Wins Above Replacement level at Sean Smith's Top 500 site.
If Tenace is counted as a 1B man, he would rank 19th all-time in OWP for a minimum of 5000 PAs. Here are the leaders
1    Lou Gehrig                 .797   
2    Dan Brouthers              .771   
3    Jimmie Foxx                .746   
4    Johnny Mize                .743   
5    Mark McGwire               .739   
6    Jason Giambi               .727   
7    Jim Thome                  .724   
8    Roger Connor               .717   
9    Hank Greenberg             .715   
10   Jeff Bagwell               .704   
11   Willie McCovey             .702   
12   Carlos Delgado             .684   
13   Todd Helton                .680   
14   Jack Fournier              .679   
15   Cap Anson                  .677   
16   Will Clark                 .674   
17   Bill Terry                 .674   
18   Norm Cash                  .672   
19   Rod Carew                  .667 
If he is counted as a catcher, he would be 2nd
1    Mike Piazza                .687   
2    Bill Dickey                .644   
3    Mickey Cochrane            .643   
4    Yogi Berra                 .629   
5    Gabby Hartnett             .610   
6    Johnny Bench               .607   
7    Jorge Posada               .606   
8    Wally Schang               .592   
9    Ted Simmons                .591   
10   Carlton Fisk               .575   
Of course, he had under 500 PAs after the age of 33, so his percentages don't suffer much from a decline phase. But still, he did rank pretty high on my OWP above .600 list, where no one is hurt by a decline phase.
Friday, September 25, 2009
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
No comments:
Post a Comment